Issue #42 in 2024 year, 148-181

Problematizing lineages: simultaneity and divergence between dependency theory and world-system analysis

Download
L. Garrido Soto

This article is an exercise in intellectual history whose objective is mainly to reveal the almost simultaneous origin between dependency theory in Latin America and world-systems analysis in the United States since the second half of the 1960s. Here we offer in great detail and textual evidence the reasons why the world-system perspective (before having been baptized as such) is not a mere US-American (or “gringo”) copy of dependency theory. This will be addressed, first of all, with an analysis of the “formal” aspects in the main dependency works—Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina (1969), by Fernando Henrique Cardoso and Enzo Faletto; Dialéctica de la dependencia (1973), by Ruy Mauro Marini; and El capitalismo dependiente latinoamericano (1974), by Vania Bambirra—through the theoretical, methodological and epistemological lenses of the essay “The Comparative Study of National Societies” published by Terence K. Hopkins and Immanuel Wallerstein in 1967 regarding the VI World Congress of Sociology in 1966 in Evian (France). Secondly, we will delve into the “substantive” aspects—that is, the methodological as well as epistemological discrepancies—between both approaches. Although they are not completely antagonistic, we want to make it clear, on the basis of their methodological and epistemological foundations, not fully discussed until now, that the lines of research in dependency theory and in world-systems analysis have divergent implications.

Keywords:
ТDependency theory; world-systems analysis; epistemological, theoretical, and methodological divergences; formal aspects; substantive aspects.
References

Agnew J. Sociologizing the Geographical Imagination: Spatial Concepts in the World-System Perspective // Political Geography Quarterly, Vol. 1, N° 2, 1982, pp. 159-166. 

Allardt E. ’Basic’ Dimensions in the Comparative Study of Social Structures // Transactions of the Sixth World Congress of Sociology, Vol. I, International Sociological Association, Evian, 4-11 de septiembre, 1966, pp. 173-186. 

Aronowitz S. A Metatheoretical Critique of Immanuel Wallerstein’s The Modern World-System // Theory and Society, Vol 10, N° 4, 1981, pp. 503-520. 

Bambirra V. El capitalismo dependiente latinoamericano. México: Siglo XXI Editores, 1974.

Bambirra V. Teoría de la dependencia: una anticrítica. México: Ediciones Era, 1978.

Blomström M., Hettne B. La teoría del desarrollo en transición. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1990.

Brenner R. The Origins of Capitalist Development: A Critique of Neo-Smithian Marxism // New Left Review, N° 104, 1977, pp. 25-92. 

Cardoso F.H., Faletto E. Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina. Ensayo de interpretación sociológica. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI editores, 2003.

Chirot D., Hall T. World-System Theory // Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 8, 1982, pp. 181-206. 

Dussel E. 16 tesis de economía política: Una filosofía de la economía. México: Siglo XXI Editores, 2014. 

Eisenstadt S.N. Problems in the Comparative Analysis of Total Societies // Transactions of the Sixth World Congress of Sociology, Vol. I, International Sociological Association, Evian, 4-11 de septiembre, 1966, pp. 187-202.

Friedmann H., Wayne J. Dependency Theory: A Critique // The Canadian Journal of Sociology, Vol. 2, N° 4, 1977, pp. 399-416. 

Gerstein I. Theories of the World Economy and Imperialism // Critical Sociology, Vol. 7, N° 2, 1977, pp. 9-22. 

Gulälp H. Frank and Wallerstein Revisited: A Contribution to Brenner’s Critique // Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol. 11, N° 2, 1982, pp. 169-188. 

Harvey D. The World-Systems Theory Trap // Studies in Comparative International Development, Vol. 22, N° 1, 1987, pp. 42-47.

Hopkins T.K., Wallerstein I. El estudio comparado de las sociedades nacionalesValparaíso: Ediciones Universitarias, 1971.

Kay C. Presentación // El giro dependentista latinoamericano. Los orígenes de la teoría marxista de la dependencia / Juan Cristóbal Cárdenas Castro y Raphael Landa Seabra (Editores). Santiago de Chile: Ariadna Ediciones, 2022. 

Marini R.M. Dialéctica de la dependencia. // América Latina, dependencia y globalización, Buenos Aires: Siglo del Hombre Editores/CLACSO, 2008.

Marini R.M. En torno a Dialéctica de la dependencia (postcriptum) // América Latina, dependencia y globalización. Buenos Aires: Siglo del Hombre Editores/CLACSO, 2008.

Marsh R.M. Making Comparative Research Cumulative // Transactions of the Sixth World Congress of Sociology, Vol. I, International Sociological Association, Evian, 4-11 de septiembre, 1966, pp. 203-221. 

Petras J., Brill H. The Tyranny of Globalism // Journal of Contemporary Asia, Vol. 15, N° 4, 1985, pp. 403-420. 

Pizarro Contador C. Prólogo // Terence K. Hopkins e Immanuel Wallerstein, El estudio comparado de las sociedades nacionales. Valparaíso: Ediciones Universitarias, 1971.

Rokkan S. Cross-National Sociology: an Introductory Note // Transactions of the Sixth World Congress of Sociology, Vol. I, International Sociological Association, Evian, 4-11 de septiembre, 1966, pp. 164-172. 

Rostow W.W. Las etapas del crecimiento económico. Un manifiesto no comunista. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1963.

Scheuch E.K. Society as Context in Cross-Cultural Comparisons // Social Science Information, Vol. VI, N° 5, 1967, pp. 7-23. 

Skocpol T. Wallerstein’s World Capitalist System: A Theoretical and Historical Critique // American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 82, N° 5, 1977, pp. 1075-1090. 

Stern S.J. Feudalismocapitalismo y el sistema mundial en la perspectiva de América Latina y el Caribe // Revista Mexicana deSociologíaVol. 49, N° 3, 1987, pp. 3-58. 

Stinchcombe A.L. The Growth of the World-System // American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 87, N° 6, 1982, pp. 1389-1395. 

Szymanski A. Capital Accumulation on a World Scale and the Necessity of Imperialism // Critical Sociology, Vol. 7, N° 2, 1977, pp. 35-53. 

Valenzuela S., Valenzuela A. Modernization and Dependency: Alternative Perspectives in the Study of Latin American Underdevelopment // Comparative Politics, Vol. 10, N° 4, 1978, pp. 535-557.